U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

Hattier v. Nethery

Hattier v. Nethery
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided January 16, 2007 · Barksdale, Jones, Wiener
213 F. App'x 363

Counsel

Craig J. Hattier, pro se., Theodore S. Owers, III, Carver, Darden, Koretzky, Tessier Finn, Blossman & Areaux, New Orleans, LA, for DefendantsAppellees.

Hattier v. Nethery

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Our review of the record on appeal and the arguments set forth in the briefs of counsel convince us that Plaintiff-Appellant Craig J. Hattier has failed to state any claim that is cognizable under federal law.

AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.