U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Hooper

United States v. Hooper
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 18, 2007 · Benavides, Higginbotham, Prado
224 F. App'x 451

United States v. Hooper

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent William Maurice Hooper has requested leave to withdraw and has filed a brief as required by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Hooper has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.