Pearlie Warfield appeals the 15-month sentence she received following her guilty-plea conviction for conspiracy to commit health care fraud, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 371. She argues that the district court erred in failing to impose a non-guideline sentence based on her age and health and in restricting its consideration of the Government’s U.S.S.G. § 5K1.1 motion for a downward departure to assistance-related concerns only.

As Warfield concedes, her arguments are foreclosed. See United States v. Guidry, 462 F.3d 373 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Desselle, 450 F.3d 179, 182-83 (5th Cir. 2006), cert. denied, — U.S.—, 127 S.Ct. 1148, — L.Ed.2d — (2007). Her contention that Guidry and Desselle were wrongly decided is unavailing. See United States v. Short, 181 F.3d 620, 624 (5th Cir. 1999).

The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.