U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Lares-Meraz

United States v. Lares-Meraz
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided July 11, 2007
234 F. App'x 265

United States v. Lares-Meraz

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ignacio Lares-Meraz (Lares) raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. Lares also raises arguments that are foreclosed by *266United States v. Mejiar-Huerta, 480 F.3d 713, 723 (5th Cir. 2007), petition for cert. filed, 75 U.S.L.W. 3585 (U.S. Apr. 18, 2007) (No. 06-1381), which held that the district court is not required to provide notice prior to sentencing of its sua sponte intention to impose a non-Guidelines sentence. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.