Martin Michael Flores has appealed the sentence imposed following revocation of his term of supervised release. Flores argues that his 24-month sentence is unreasonable because it is above the advisory guideline range and the sentencing factors cited by the district court are taken into account by the Sentencing Guidelines.

The district court properly considered the 18 U.S.C. § 3553(a) factors when imposing Flores’s sentence. See United States v. Gonzalez, 250 F.3d 923, 930 (5th Cir. 2001). The sentence is neither unreasonable nor plainly unreasonable. See United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 120 (5th Cir. 2005), cert. denied, 547 U.S. 1083, 126 S.Ct. 1804, 164 L.Ed.2d 540 (2006).

AFFIRMED.