U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Clark

United States v. Clark
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided November 13, 2007 · Benavides, Garza, Wiener
254 F. App'x 336

United States v. Clark

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Ginger Lynn Egan has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Egan has not filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of any claims of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cm. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.