U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2007

United States v. Canady

United States v. Canady
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 12, 2007 · Barksdale, Garza, Reavley
257 F. App'x 828

United States v. Canady

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Kenyatta Dante Canady has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Canady has not filed a response. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivolous is-. sue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.