U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Nolen

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided September 25, 2008 · Jolly, Davis, Wiener

543 F.3d 732; 2008 U.S. App. LEXIS 20328; 2008 WL 4378078 (Federal Reporter, Third Series)

Counsel

Alan L. Hechtkopf, Samuel Robert Lyons (argued), U.S. Dept, of Justice, Tax Div., Washington, DC, Terri Lynn Hagan, Asst. U.S. Atty., Plano, TX, for U.S., Peter Goldberger (argued), Law Office of Peter Goldberger, Admore, PA, for No-len.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

United States v. Daniel Thody (5th Cir. 2017)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

WIENER, Circuit Judge:

Before us following our second remand to the district court is that court’s Order on Remand filed August 7, 2008, in which, following a hearing attended by counsel for the government in person and by Defendant-Appellant via telephone after waiving attendance in person and waiving representation by counsel, the district court ordered restitution reimposed in the amount of $223,509. We have again reviewed the record on appeal, the filings of the parties, and the ruling of the district court on remand, as a result of which we are satisfied that the proceeding in the district court satisfied the requirements of due process and that the court’s reimposition of the restitution element of its sentence is appropriate in all respects. Accordingly, *733 Nolen s sentence, including restitution of $223,509, is

AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.