United States v. Gonzalez-Maldonado
United States v. Gonzalez-Maldonado
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
FILED January 30, 2008 No. 07-50774 Consolidated with Charles R. Fulbruge III No. 07-50782 Clerk Conference Calendar
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.
SABINO GONZALEZ-MALDONADO, also known as Sabino Gonzalez
Defendant-Appellant
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:06-CR-1390-ALL USDC No. 3:07-CR-441-ALL
Before REAVLEY, BENAVIDES, and ELROD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgments in Criminal Cases, Sabino Gonzalez-Maldonado raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States,
523 U.S. 224, 235(1998), which held that
8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-
* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 07-50774 c/w No. 07-50782
Arrellano,
492 F.3d 624, 625(5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied,
2008 WL 59441(Jan. 7, 2008) (No. 07-6202). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgments of the district court are AFFIRMED.
2
Reference
- Status
- Unpublished