United States v. Rodriguez-Olmos

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Rodriguez-Olmos, 263 F. App'x 441 (5th Cir. 2008)

United States v. Rodriguez-Olmos

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Rene Rodriguez-Olmos raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Rene RODRIGUEZ-OLMOS, Also Known as Rene Olmos-Rodriguez, Also Known as Rene Rodriguez, Also Known as Rene Olmos, Also Known as Rene Rodriguez-Perez, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished