Fred Scott, Texas prisoner #907987, appeals the dismissal of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint as time-barred pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1915A(b)(l), 1915(e)(2)(B)(I), (ii). He argues that the statute of limitations should be tolled because the defendants fraudulently concealed their actions, preventing him from timely learning the facts underlying his claims.

Scott states that he learned the factual basis underlying his claims in January 2000. Therefore, barring tolling, he had until January 2002 to file a timely § 1983 complaint. Scott’s allegations of fraudulent concealment are not a basis for tolling of the limitations period because they relate to actions occurring prior to January 2000. Accordingly, Scott’s § 1983 complaint, filed in July 2005, is barred by the statute of limitations. *367 The district court’s dismissal of Scott’s action as frivolous and for failure to state a claim counts as a strike for purposes of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g). See Adepegba v. Hammons, 108 F.3d 383, 387 (5th Cir. 1996). Scott is cautioned that if he accumulates three strikes pursuant to § 1915(g), he may not proceed in forma pauperis in any civil action or appeal filed while he is incarcerated or detained in any facility unless he is under imminent danger of serious physical injury. See § 1915(g).

AFFIRMED; SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.