Willis Maurice Irving appeals his sentence for possession of a firearm by a felon. While he was represented by appointed counsel at sentencing, Irving was allowed great latitude to make arguments (and have witnesses testify) on his own behalf. Nevertheless, Irving argues that the district court erred by denying his requests, made for the first time at the sentencing hearing, to dismiss appointed counsel and represent himself. Because he repeatedly stated that he would “defend” himself but did not intend to “represent” himself, Irving’s waiver of counsel was not sufficiently “clear and unequivocal.” Bur ton v. Collins, 937 F.2d 131, 133 (5th Cir. 1991).

AFFIRMED.