U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Gardner

United States v. Gardner
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided February 20, 2008 · King, Wiener, Elrod
266 F. App'x 334

United States v. Gardner

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Antonio Maurice Gardner has moved for *335 leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Gardner has filed a response. Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Gardner’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.