United States v. Lewis

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Lewis, 267 F. App'x 320 (5th Cir. 2008)

United States v. Lewis

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Michael Lewis has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Lewis has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at *321 this time of Lewis’s claim of ineffective assistance of counsel. See United States v. Cantwell, 470 F.3d 1087, 1091 (5th Cir. 2006). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Lewis’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Michael LEWIS, Also Known as MD, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished