Gustavo Bustos appeals the sentence imposed following his guilty plea to conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute marihuana. He argues that his sentence is unreasonable.

Bustos was sentenced within the applicable guideline sentencing range, and his *306 sentence is presumptively reasonable. See United States v. Alonzo, 435 F.3d 551, 554 (5th Cir. 2006). He presented no argument in the district court in mitigation of sentence. Moreover, that court adequately explained its reasoning for the sentence. See Rita v. United States, — U.S.-, 127 S.Ct. 2456, 2468, 168 L.Ed.2d 203 (2007). Bustos has not rebutted the presumption of reasonableness applicable to his within-guidelines sentence, and the district court did not abuse its discretion. See Gall v. United States, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 586, 597, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007).

AFFIRMED.