Jose Zarazua-Aleman appeals his conviction and sentence for being found unlawfully in the United States, following removal. He presents two issues.

Zarazua maintains the district court erred in applying a 16-level enhancement, pursuant to Sentencing Guidelines § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii), based on determining his prior Texas conviction for burglary of a habitation was a crime of violence (COV). Zarazua recognizes our court has held that an offense committed under Texas Penal Code § 30.02(a)(1) (burglary of a habitation), the statute of his conviction, is a COV for purposes of § 2L1.2, but he maintains the recent decision in James v. United States, — U.S. -, 127 S.Ct. 1586, 1599-1600, 167 L.Ed.2d 532 (2007), overrules our court’s precedent. This contention is without merit; James does not concern enumerated offenses and pertains only to a residual provision in 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(2)(B)(ii), which § 2L1.2 does not contain. See United States v. Gomez-Guerra, 485 F.3d 301, 303 n. 1 (5th Cir.), cert. *387 denied, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 156, 169 L.Ed.2d 106 (2007). The district court did not err in applying the COV enhancement. See United States v. Garcia-Mendez, 420 F.3d 454, 456-57 (5th Cir. 2005).

In the light of Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), Zarazua challenges the constitutionality of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)’s treatment of prior felony and aggravated felony convictions as sentencing factors, rather than elements of the offense that must be found by a jury. This contention is foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872,169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008).

AFFIRMED.