U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Rowe

United States v. Rowe
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 2, 2008 · Davis, Per Curiam, Smith, Southwick
272 F. App'x 372

United States v. Rowe

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Clyde Rowe raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Hinson, 429 F.3d 114, 119 (5th Cir. 2005), which held that a defendant is not entitled to a jury trial to determine whether the terms of supervised release have been violated. The Government’s motion for summary af- *373 firmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.