Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Marcos Antonio Castillo raises arguments that are foreclosed by United States v. Lopez-Ortiz, 313 F.3d 225, 229-31 (5th *325 Cir. 2002), which held that an immigration judge’s failure to inform an alien of his eligibility for discretionary waiver of removal at his removal proceeding did not render the proceeding fundamentally unfair. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.