Emile Nickerson was convicted of three counts of distributing crack cocaine and sentenced to serve ten years in prison. Nickerson appeals his convictions. He argues that he should have been permitted to withdraw his pleas because the district court did not accept them at rearraignment. Nickerson has shown no plain error in connection with this claim. See United States v. Vasquez, 216 F.3d 456, 459 (5th Cir. 2000). Indeed, Nickerson has failed to show that the district court did not accept his plea at rearraignment. Rather, the record is unclear concerning when the plea was accepted. A fortiorari, Nickerson has shown no plain error in connection with his claim that he was entitled to withdraw his plea because it had not yet been accepted. See id. The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.