Jose David Perez-Cepeda appeals the 78-month sentence that was imposed following his conviction for possession of more than five kilograms of cocaine with intent to distribute. Perez-Cepeda argues that the district court erred by denying his request for an additional one-level reduction to his offense level for acceptance of responsibility. The Government did not move for such a reduction. Consequently, the district court did not err by denying this request. See U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1, comment. (n.6).

*508 Perez-Cepeda also argues that his sentence, which was within the pertinent guidelines range, was unreasonable. Our review of the record shows no error in connection with Perez-Cepeda’s sentence. The district court committed no procedural error at sentencing, and the sentence imposed is substantively reasonable. See Gall v. United States, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 586, 594, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.