Lawrence Matlock appeals his jury convictions for possession with intent to distribute crack, possession of a firearm in furtherance of a drug trafficking crime, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon. He argues that the district court abused its discretion in denying his second motion for a trial continuance.

“Trial judges have broad discretion in deciding requests for continuances, and [this court] reviews only for an abuse of that discretion resulting in serious prejudice.” United States v. German, 486 F.3d 849, 854 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, —— U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 649, 169 L.Ed.2d 516 (2007). Matlock has not alleged, much less established, prejudice as a result of the district court’s ruling. He has therefore not shown an abuse of discretion on the part of the district court.

AFFIRMED.