U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2008

Howard v. Astrue

Howard v. Astrue
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 6, 2008 · Reavley, Barksdale, Benavides
268 F. App'x 341

Counsel

David Lee Howard, Jourdanton, TX, pro se., La Feria A. Howard, Jourdanton, TX, pro se., Lynda S. Howard, Jourdanton, TX, pro se., David Howard, Jr., Jourdanton, TX, pro se., Tatsuo R. Howard, Jourdanton, TX, pro se., Youko M. Howard, Jourdanton, TX, pro se., Precious T. Howard, Jourdanton, TX, pro se., Princess M. Howard, Jourdanton, TX, pro se., Gary Layton Anderson, U.S. Attorney’s Office, Western District of Texas, San Antonio, TX, for Defendant-Appellee.

Howard v. Astrue

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The only legal question before this court, and the only question over which we have jurisdiction, is the legal correctness of the district court’s judgment entered on August 1, 2007. That presents the question of whether substantial evidence supports the Commissioner’s decision and computation of Mr. Howard’s Social Security benefits. This court agrees with the district court and affirms that judgment.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.