U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Cardiel

United States v. Cardiel
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 5, 2008

United States v. Cardiel

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED March 5, 2008 No. 07-51107 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff-Appellee v. DIEGO SORIANO CARDIEL Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:07-CR-774-ALL

Before KING, STEWART, and PRADO, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Diego Soriano Cardiel raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda- Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4.

No. 07-51107 The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.