U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Perez-Gonzalez

United States v. Perez-Gonzalez
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided March 5, 2008 · King, Stewart, Prado
268 F. App'x 331

United States v. Perez-Gonzalez

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Antero Perez-Gonzalez raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The judgment of *332 the district court is AFFIRMED. The Government’s motion for summary affir-mance, which relies on inapposite authority, is DENIED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.