Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Roberto Antonio Fernandez, Jr., raises arguments challenging the constitutionality of the use of prior convictions pursuant to 21 U.S.C. §§ 841, 851, and 962 to increase his sentence. He concedes that his arguments are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998). See, e.g., United States v. Mata, 491 F.3d 237, 245 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 1219, — L.Ed.2d-(2008); United States v. Slaughter, 238 F.3d 580, 582-84 (5th Cir. 2000). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.