Gonzalo Vidaurri has appealed his jury conviction of conspiracy to possess with intent to distribute cocaine, possession with intent to distribute cocaine, and aiding and abetting. Vidaurri contends that *128 the evidence was insufficient to prove his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Vidaurri complains that he was convicted on the basis of circumstantial evidence only and that the Government did not prove that he knew of the cocaine distribution venture.

Vidaurri did not move the district court for a judgment of acquittal. Accordingly, his “challenge to evidence sufficiency is reviewed only for a manifest miscarriage of justice—the record must be devoid of evidence of guilt or the evidence must be so tenuous that a conviction is shocking.” United States v. Avants, 367 F.3d 433, 449 (5th Cir. 2004). Vidaurri’s post-arrest statements and the circumstances surrounding his arrest provide proof of his guilty knowledge and his participation in the conspiracy. See United States v. Maltos, 985 F.2d 743, 746 (5th Cir. 1992). The conviction is

AFFIRMED.