Benjamin Michael Rollar pleaded guilty to the charge of possession with intent to *323 distribute 100 kilograms or more of marijuana. Kollar has appealed, contending that the district court clearly erred in overruling his objection to the probation officer’s drug-quantity determination. Kollar contends that the district court erred in extrapolating the quantity attributable to him as relevant conduct.

The district court’s drug-quantity finding was based primarily on Kollar’s own statements. The finding is not clearly erroneous because it is plausible in light of the record as a whole. See United States v. Cisneros-Gutierrez, 517 F.3d 751, 764 (5th Cir. 2008). Kollar has not shown that the district court abused its discretion in imposing the sentence. See Gall v. United States, — U.S.—, 128 S.Ct. 586, 596-97, 169 L.Ed.2d 445 (2007). The judgment is AFFIRMED.