U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Osorio-Zuniga

United States v. Osorio-Zuniga
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided December 4, 2008 · Garwood, Garza, Owen
301 F. App'x 328

United States v. Osorio-Zuniga

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Ismael Osorio-Zuniga raises arguments that are foreclosed by AlmendarezTorres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.