U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2008

United States v. Rosales

United States v. Rosales
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided April 2, 2008
272 F. App'x 364

United States v. Rosales

Opinion of the Court

PER CURIAM: *

Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Hugo Noel Rosales raises arguments ■that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pinedar-Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 128 S.Ct. 872, 169 L.Ed.2d 737 (2008). The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under *365the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.