National Resort Management Corp. v. Cortez
National Resort Management Corp. v. Cortez
278 F. App'x 377
National Resort Management Corp. v. Cortez
Opinion of the Court
We VACATE the judgment of the district court and REMAND for reconsideration in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in Hall Street Associates, L.L.C. v. Mattel, Inc., — U.S.-, 128 S.Ct. 1396, 170 L.Ed.2d 254 (2008) (holding that, regardless of the parties’ agreement to the contrary, district courts must review an arbitrator’s findings of fact and conclusions of law under the highly deferential standard set forth in 9 U.S.C. § 10(a)).
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.