Jason Bowen, federal prisoner # 09907-031, appeals the dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 petition. Bowen alleged that he was subjected to and engaged in sexual activity with Tennessee prison officials and that drugs were planted in his cubicle. Bowen asserted that as a result of these incidents, he was confined in a special housing unit and subsequently was transferred to a prison in Mississippi. Bowen contends that because he is asserting that he is incarcerated in the wrong prison, § 2241 is the proper vehicle for his claims.

Because a favorable determination would not automatically entitle Bowen to accelerated release from custody, his claims do not arise under § 2241. See Carson v. Johnson, 112 F.3d 818, 820-21 (5th Cir. 1997). Claims that have no relation to a prisoner’s ultimate date of release from custody are not grounds for habeas relief. Malehi v. Thaler, 211 F.3d 953, 958-59 (5th Cir. 2000). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.