United States v. Harris
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Harris, 310 F. App'x 716 (5th Cir. 2009)
United States v. Harris
Opinion
The attorney appointed to represent Daniel Lee Harris has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. *717 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Harris’s outstanding pro se motions are DENIED. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no non-frivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.
*
Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Daniel Lee HARRIS, Defendant-Appellant
- Status
- Unpublished