The attorney appointed to represent Melvin Miller has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). That brief, inter alia: addresses the two issues identified in our court’s prior order; and alleges no prejudice. See United States v. Miller, No. 07-40880 (5th Cir.19 Aug. 2008) (denying counsel’s previous motion to withdraw and directing counsel to file a brief addressing concerns related to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure 11(b)(2) and 11(b)(1)(E)). Miller has not filed a response.

Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief disclose no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.