Petitioner challenges the decision by the Federal Aviation Administration to adopt a supplemental environmental impact statement (SEIS) completed by the Air Force after our remand in Davis Mountains Trans-Pecos Heritage Ass’n v. FAA, 116 Fed.Appx. 3 (5th Cir. 2004) (Davis Moun *821 tains I). We held in that case that the respondents did not satisfy the National Environmental Policy Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 4321-4370f, because they failed to address adequately wake vortex impacts and FAA comments. We are satisfied that the SEIS adequately addressed our concerns in Davis Mountains I, and that the FAA’s decision was not arbitrary or capricious. See Miss. River Basin Alliance v. Westphal, 230 F.3d 170, 174 (5th Cir. 2000); 5 U.S.C. § 706.

PETITION DENIED.