United States v. Owens

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Owens, 311 F. App'x 707 (5th Cir. 2009)

United States v. Owens

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED February 18, 2009 No. 08-10578 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JAMES KENNETH OWENS

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 7:06-CR-12-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DENNIS, and PRADO, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* The attorney appointed to represent James Kenneth Owens has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California,

386 U.S. 738

(1967). Owens has filed a response. The record is insufficiently developed to allow consideration at this time of Owens’s claims of ineffective assistance of counsel; such claims generally “cannot be resolved on direct appeal when [they have] not been raised before the district court since no opportunity

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. No. 08-10578

existed to develop the record on the merits of the allegations.” United States v. Cantwell,

470 F.3d 1087, 1091

(5th Cir. 2006) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). Our independent review of the record, counsel’s brief, and Owens’s response discloses no nonfrivolous issue for appeal. Accordingly, the motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5 TH C IR. R. 42.2.

2

Reference

Status
Unpublished