In this diversity action, 6320 Hayne Blvd., Inc., appeals the judgment, entered following a two-day bench trial, in favor of Hallmark Capital Group, LLC. This action concerns post-Hurricane Katrina emergency repairs by Hallmark to Appellant’s property.

Appellant contends the district court erred by finding no contract existed between the parties. In the alternative, it contends the district court erred by awarding Hallmark compensation under the equitable doctrine of actio de in rem verso (a Louisiana-law term for unjust enrichment) in the absence of sufficiently detailed proof of Hallmark’s expenses and in an amount greater than the benefit Appellant derived from Hallmark’s work. In that regard, the district court awarded far less in damages than the amount sought by Hallmark.

“On appeal from a judgment after a bench trial, we review the findings of fact for clear error and the legal issues de novo.” Houston Exploration Co. v. Halliburton Energy Servs., Inc., 359 F.3d 777, 779 (5th Cir. 2004). Essentially for the reasons stated in the district court’s detailed and well-reasoned Order and Reasons of 20 March 2008, the judgment is

AFFIRMED.