Alan D. Bevers appeals his conditional guilty plea conviction to 18 U.S.C. § 2251(a), sexual exploitation of a child. He argues that the factual basis of his plea did not establish that the victim engaged in “sexually explicit conduct” because the videotape in question did not depict a lascivious exhibition of the minor’s genitals or pubic area. We review the district court’s factual finding for clear error. 1

Using the “Dost factors” adopted by this court to determine whether a visual depiction of a minor constitutes a “lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area,” 2 the district court pointed to several pertinent facts: that the videotape focused on the fully nude genitalia of a female child taking a shower; captured the child’s buttocks and breast; and was taped with the purpose of eliciting a sexual response from the viewer.

We cannot say that the district court’s finding that the depiction at issue constituted a lascivious exhibition of the genitals or pubic area of the victim is clear error. The sexually explicit conduct element of § 2251(a) was met, and the factual basis is sufficient to support Bevers’s plea. 3

AFFIRMED.