United States v. Espinoza-Cruz

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
United States v. Espinoza-Cruz, 324 F. App'x 436 (5th Cir. 2009)
Dennis, Haynes, Jones, Per Curiam

United States v. Espinoza-Cruz

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The attorney appointed to represent Maria Guadalupe Espinoza-Cruz has moved for leave to withdraw and has filed a brief in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Espinoza-Cruz has not filed a response in English as instructed. Our independent review of the record and counsel’s brief discloses no nonfrivo-lous issue for appeal. Accordingly, counsel’s motion for leave to withdraw is GRANTED, counsel is excused from further responsibilities herein, and the APPEAL IS DISMISSED. See 5th Cir. R. 42.2.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cm. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cm. R. 47.5.4.

Reference

Full Case Name
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee v. Maria Guadalupe ESPINOZA-CRUZ, Also Known as Maria Guadalupe Espinosa-Cruz, Defendant-Appellant
Status
Unpublished