Alice Shockey sued for age discrimination after she was fired. The district court denied relief, concluding that Shockey had been terminated for poor performance.

We have read the briefs and pertinent parts of the record, have consulted the relevant caselaw, and have heard the arguments of counsel. We find no error, and certainly no clear error, in the district court’s findings of fact or conclusions of *313 law. In summary, the court correctly found that the employer “terminated Plaintiff because it held a good faith belief that Plaintiff did not meet her quota[, and P]laintiff, in fact, did not meet her quota, or meet the expectations laid out in her Performance Improvement Plan.”

The judgment is AFFIRMED.