Bates v. Astrue
Bates v. Astrue
Opinion
Plaintiff-Appellant Gloria J. Bates (“Bates”) appeals the Commissioner of Social Security’s denial of her application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental security income benefits. On review, “we consider only whether the Commissioner applied the proper legal standards and whether substantial evidence in the record supports the decision to deny benefits.” Audler v. Astrue, 501 F.3d 446, 447 (5th Cir. 2007); see 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). As Magistrate Judge Clinton E. Averitte’s thorough Report and Recommendation explained, see Bates v. Astrue, No. 2:05-cv-0269, 2008 WL 4367287 (N.D.Tex. Sept. 24, 2008), the Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) applied the proper legal standards, and the medical records from Doctors Plata and Saadeh provide substantial evidence to support the ALJ’s finding that Bates was not disabled.
AFFIRMED.
Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.