Moisés Aron Rodriguez-Funez was convicted of one count of illegal reentry into the United States and was sentenced to serve 37 months in prison. Rodriguez-Funez appeals his sentence. He argues that he should be resentencecl because the district court erroneously believed that his *430 prior conviction was for an aggravated felony. He concedes that this claim is reviewed for plain error only due to his failure to raise it in the district court.

A review of the record shows that the same sentence could be imposed upon Rodriguez-Funez if this case were remanded for resentencing. This review likewise does not show that it is reasonably probable that Rodriguez-Funez would have received a different sentence but for the district court’s erroneous belief concerning his prior conviction. Consequently, Rodriguez-Funez has not shown plain error in connection with his sentence, nor has he established that he should receive relief on this claim. See Puckett v. United States, — U.S. -, -, 129 S.Ct. 1423, 1429, 173 L.Ed.2d 266 (2009); United States v. Jones, 444 F.3d 430, 437-38 (5th Cir. 2006). The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.