Kenny Franklin Edmonson appeals the revocation of his supervised release, following a 2002 conviction for access device fraud. See 18 U.S.C. § 1029(a)(2). Ed-monson has served the term of imprisonment imposed upon revocation, and the district court imposed no further term of supervised release. Therefore, Edmonson has no “concrete and continuing injury,” and there is no case or controversy over which this court may exercise jurisdiction under Article III, § 2, of the Constitution. Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 7, 14, 118 S.Ct. 978, 140 L.Ed.2d 43 (1998). The Government’s motion to strike the reply brief is DENIED as unnecessary, and this appeal is DISMISSED as moot.