Celestino Rivera-Castañeda (Rivera) appeals the 70-month sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry following a previous deportation. He contends that the district court reversibly erred in applying the U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 enhancement to his sentence based upon his prior Texas conviction for indecency with a child-contact, a violation of Texas Penal Code § 21.11(a)(1). He asserts that a violation of § 21.11(a)(1) does not constitute the enumerated offense of sexual abuse of a minor for purposes of the § 2L1;2 enhancement.

As Rivera acknowledges, this court has already addressed the issue of whether a prior Texas conviction for indecency with a child, a violation of § 21.11(a)(1), constitutes sexual abuse of a minor for purposes of § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). See United States v. Ayala, 542 F.3d 494, 495 (5th Cir. 2008), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 1388, 173 L.Ed.2d 639 (2009); United States v. Najera-Najera, 519 F.3d 509, 511-12 (5th Cir.), cert. denied,-U.S.-, 129 S.Ct. 139, 172 L.Ed.2d 105 (2008); United States v. Zavala-Sustaita, 214 F.3d 601, 604 (5th Cir. 2000). Because Rivera’s only argument on appeal is foreclosed by this court’s precedent, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.