U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2009

United States v. Santoya-Delgado

United States v. Santoya-Delgado
U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided August 18, 2009

United States v. Santoya-Delgado

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit FILED August 18, 2009 No. 09-50060 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff-Appellee v. JOSE IVAN SANTOYA-DELGADO, also known as Oscar Arvizu, also known as Jose Santoyo-Delgado, Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 3:08-CR-2558-ALL

Before HIGGINBOTHAM, DAVIS, and CLEMENT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:* Appealing the judgment in a criminal case, Jose Ivan Santoya-Delgado raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235 (1998), which held that 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) is a penalty provision and not a separate criminal offense. United States v. Pineda- Arrellano, 492 F.3d 624, 625 (5th Cir. 2007), cert. denied, 128 S. Ct. 872 (2008).

The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is GRANTED, and the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR . R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR .

R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.