IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit

FILED October 20, 2009 No. 08-50798 Conference Calendar Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee

v.

JOSE JUAN SERRANO-MEZA,

Defendant-Appellant

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. 2:07-CR-979-1

Before WIENER, BENAVIDES, and STEWART, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:* Jose Juan Serrano-Meza appeals the 70-month within-guidelines sentence imposed following his guilty plea to illegal reentry following deportation in violation of

. He argues that his sentence is unreasonable because the illegal reentry guidelines double count a defendant’s criminal record, resulting in a sentencing range that is greater than necessary to meet the goals of

(a). He also argues that this court should not afford his

* Pursuant to 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5 TH C IR. R. 47.5.4. No. 08-50798

sentence a presumption of reasonableness because U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2 is not empirically based. He contends that his sentence failed to reflect that he had no prior immigration convictions, that he did not realize he faced such a high sentence, that the longest sentence he had served was three years, and that he reentered this country to work. Serrano-Meza’s challenge to the presumption of reasonableness is foreclosed. See United States v. Duarte,

(5th Cir. 2009), cert. denied,

(Oct. 5, 2009) (No. 09-6195); see also United States v. Mondragon-Santiago,

(5th Cir. 2009), cert. denied,

(Oct. 5, 2009) (No. 08-11099). We have also rejected the argument that using a prior conviction to increase the offense level and in calculating criminal history is impermissible “double counting.” See United States v. Calbat,

(5th Cir. 2001). Serrano-Meza has not rebutted the presumption that the district court sentenced him to a reasonable, properly calculated within-guidelines sentence. See United States v. Campos-Maldonado,

(5th Cir.), cert. denied,

(2008); United States v. Alonzo,

(5th Cir. 2006). The district court’s judgment is AFFIRMED.

2