Enrique Lumdury Castellanos (Lumdu-ry) was convicted of, inter alia, a marijuana conspiracy with Jorge Luis Saenz and others. He now appeals the district court’s denial of a two-level minor role adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3B1.2. For the following reasons, we affirm.

We review the district court’s conclusion that Lumdury was not a minor participant for clear error. See United States v. Villanueva, 408 F.3d 193, 203 & n. 9 (5th Cir. 2005). The presentence report and the factual basis provided, inter alia, that when police searched Lumdury’s home, they found over 27 pounds of marijuana and roughly $55,000 in cash concealed in the walls, as well as items consistent with the resale of marijuana; that Lumdury had also stored another load of marijuana at his home for Saenz; that Lumdury had sold marijuana for Saenz; and that Lum-dury had conversations with a coconspirator after Saenz was arrested during which he discussed undertaking efforts to secure Saenz’s release on bail and arrange for a lawyer for Saenz and another coconspirator. Given these facts, we cannot say that the district court’s conclusion that Lumdu-ry was not a minor player, i.e., that his involvement was not peripheral to the advancement of the criminal activity, was implausible in light of the record as a whole. See Villanueva, 408 F.3d at 203-04.

The judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.