Gilberto Maldonado-Reyes pleaded guilty to possession with intent to distribute a quantity in excess of 500 grams of cocaine. On appeal, he challenges his sentence and his counsel’s effectiveness with regard to his sentence. The government argues that he waived his right to appeal.

We review the validity of an appeal waiver de novo. United States v. Burns, 433 F.3d 442, 445 (5th Cir. 2005). Our review of the record shows that Maldonado-Reyes’s waiver of appeal was knowing and voluntary, see United States v. Bond, 414 F.3d 542, 544 (5th Cir. 2005), and is therefore valid, so we decline to consider the merits of his claims. The appeal is DISMISSED.