George Boutros Ata petitions this court *903 for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal and affirming the immigration judge’s order that Ata is removable pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1227(a)(2)(A)(iii) and ineligible for cancellation of removal pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(a)(3) because he committed an aggravated felony.

Ata specifically contends that the BIA improperly characterized his 2007 Texas conviction for marijuana possession as an aggravated felony punishable under the Controlled Substances Act, particularly 21 U.S.C. § 844(a), because he was neither prosecuted nor convicted under a relevant federal or state recidivist offender statute; that the BIA should not have followed the hypothetical approach used by this court in United States v. Sanchez-Villalobos, 412 F.3d 572 (5th Cir. 2005) because SanchezVillalobos contravenes prior precedent in the immigration context; and that the rule of lenity should be applied to resolve any lingering ambiguities in the statutory language. Ata’s arguments are foreclosed by our decision in Carachuri-Rosendo v. Holder, 570 F.3d 263 (5th Cir. 2009), petition for cert. filed 78 U.S.L.W. 3058 (2009) (No. 09-60).

Ata does not challenge the BIA’s determinations regarding his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture. Any such challenges are abandoned. See Soadjede v. Ashcroft, 324 F.3d 830, 833 (5th Cir. 2003).

Accordingly, Ata’s petition for review is DENIED.