Antonio Gonzalez-Molina appeals his sentence for illegal reentry after deporta *960 tion in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a). Gonzalez-Molina contends that the district court committed plain error by applying a 16-level increase to his offense level based on its finding that his 2000 Pennsylvania conviction for aggravated assault was a crime of violence under U.S.S.G. § 2L1.2(b)(l)(A)(ii). The Government concedes that neither the law nor the record establishes that Gonzalez-Molina’s prior conviction was a crime of violence for purposes of the enhancement and that it was plain error to increase Gonzalez-Molina’s sentence based on that conviction.

After reviewing the record and the applicable law, we agree that the district court committed plain error by using Gonzalez-Molina’s Pennsylvania aggravated-assault conviction to increase his sentence. See United States v. Fierro-Reyna, 466 F.3d 324, 327-29 (5th Cir. 2006); United States v. Alfaro, 408 F.3d 204, 211 (5th Cir. 2005). Accordingly, we vacate Gonzalez-Molina’s sentence and remand for re-sentencing. See Alfaro, 408 F.3d at 211.

CONVICTION AFFIRMED; SENTENCE VACATED; CASE REMANDED.