U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit, 2009

United States V. Clinton Wade Dunson

U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Decided October 2, 2009 · No. 06-11374 · Benavides, Jolly, Stewart

345 F. App'x 956

Counsel

Mark L. Nichols, Assistant U.S. Attorney, U.S. Attorney’s Office Northern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Plaintiff-Appellee., Room 9A10, Federal Public Defender’s Office Noi’thern District of Texas, Fort Worth, TX, for Defendant-Appellant.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

State v. Nolen (Vt. 2012)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

ON REMAND FROM THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

PER CURIAM: *

This case returns to us on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States. The Supreme Court vacated our judgment and remanded the case for further consideration in light of Arizona v. Gant, — U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1710, 173 L.Ed.2d 485 (2009). We retain jurisdiction of the appeal and remand for the limited purpose of having the district court conduct an evidentiary hearing and whatever other proceedings it deems appropriate for a determination on the issue of inevitable discovery. See United States v. Casper, 332 Fed.Appx. 222, 223 (5th Cir. 2009); see also United States v. Runyan, 275 F.3d 449, 466-67 (5th Cir. 2001).

REMANDED.

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir R. 47.5.4.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.